ntfrsutl är ett kommandoradsprogram som man kan använda för att hämta all möjlig information om ett aktivt DFS.
Problemet är att jag inte lyckas hitta någon dokumentation...
Det jag specifikt vill ta reda på är vilka olika koder som finns under rubriken "state" som man får fram genom att köra "ntfrsutl sets". Jag har sett både rena sifferkoder och översatta felmeddelande där, men jag har ärligt talat ingen om vad någon av dem betyder, vilket förstås är mitt huvudproblem .
Någon som har lite koll på detta verktyg?
ntfrsutl
ntfrsutl
The three most dangerous things in the world are a programmer with a soldering iron, a hardware type with a program patch and a user with an idea.
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is.
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is.
Re: ntfrsutl
Fick svar i Microsofts forum och kopierar in det här:
David Shen - MSFT wrote: Hello Andreas,
Based on the research, there is no such a document to record all the raw number and error codes publicly. I understand that it would be better if we have a document to record these error code with ntfrsutl logs. I will forward this request to the document team.
Currently, you may refer to the following Ntfrsutl TechNet Library.
Ntfrsutl Overview
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/libr ... 55455.aspx
Ntfrsutl Examples
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/libr ... 57087.aspx
Meanwhile, to troubleshoot FRS issue, you may consider using the GUI tool called FRSDisag
How to get the most from your FRSDiag
http://blogs.technet.com/askds/archive/ ... sdiag.aspx
Hope this can be helpful. Thank you for your feedback.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
The three most dangerous things in the world are a programmer with a soldering iron, a hardware type with a program patch and a user with an idea.
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is.
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is.